Strontium-loaded 3D intramedullary nail titanium implant for critical-sized femoral defect in rabbits.

The treatment of critical-sized bone defects has long been a major problem for surgeons. In this study, an intramedullary nail shaped three-dimensional (3D)-printed porous titanium implant that is capable of releasing strontium ions was developed through a simple and cost-effective surface modification technique. The feasibility of this implant as a stand-alone solution was evaluated using a rabbit's segmental diaphyseal as a defect model. The strontium-loaded implant exhibited a favorable environment for cell adhesion, and mechanical properties that were commensurate with those of a rabbit's cortical bone. Radiographic, biomechanical, and histological analyses revealed a significantly higher amount of bone ingrowth and superior bone-bonding strength in the strontium-loaded implant when compared to an untreated porous titanium implant. Furthermore, one-year histological observations revealed that the strontium-loaded implant preserved the native-like diaphyseal bone structure without failure. These findings suggest that strontium-releasing 3D-printed titanium implants have the clinical potential to induce the early and efficient repair of critical-sized, load-bearing bone defects.

Frequency and determinants of serum calcium monitoring during eldecalcitol therapy in patients with osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION: Eldecalcitol (ELD) is an active vitamin D3 analog (AVD) commonly used to treat osteoporosis in Japan. Although routine monitoring of serum calcium levels during ELD therapy is recommended, little is known about the actual frequency and determinants of monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive cohort study using a Japanese electronic medical records database. We identified osteoporosis patients who initiated treatment with ELD or other AVDs (alfacalcidol and calcitriol) between April 1, 2011 and September 10, 2021. The index date for cohort entry was the first prescription date of ELD or other AVDs. The frequency of serum calcium monitoring was evaluated every 6 months. Determinants of serum calcium monitoring were identified using multivariable logistic regression models. We also calculated the incidence of hypercalcemia and the frequency of serum calcium monitoring within 6 months before hypercalcemia. RESULTS: We identified 12,671 ELD users and 7867 other AVD users. Within 6 months after cohort entry, 45.9% of ELD users and 58.7% of other AVD users underwent serum calcium monitoring. Female sex, no use of systemic corticosteroids, moderate-to-good renal function, treatment in smaller hospitals, and treatment in orthopedic surgery departments were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving serum calcium monitoring during ELD therapy. The incidence of hypercalcemia among ELD users was 6.36 per 100 person-years, with 20.6% of cases not receiving serum calcium monitoring before hypercalcemia. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that serum calcium monitoring is not given adequate attention during ELD therapy in routine clinical practice.

Are Dental Procedures Associated With Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis?

BACKGROUND: Dental procedures can lead to bacteremia and have been considered a potential risk factor for pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). However, data on the association between dental procedures and PVO are limited. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) After controlling for relevant confounding variables, are dental procedures associated with an increased risk of PVO? (2) Does antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures effectively decrease the risk of PVO? METHODS: A case-crossover study was conducted to investigate the association between dental procedures and PVO using a Japanese claims database. The advantage of this study design is that confounding factors that do not vary over time are automatically adjusted for, because cases act as their own controls. From April 2014 to September 2021, the database included 8414 patients who were hospitalized for PVO. Of these, 50% (4182 of 8414) were excluded because they had not undergone any dental procedures before the index date, a further 0.1% (10 of 8414) were excluded because they were younger than 18 years at the index date, and a further 7% (623 of 8414) were excluded because they did not have at least 20 weeks of continuous enrollment before the index date, leaving 43% (3599 of 8414) eligible for analysis here. The mean age was 77 ± 11 years, and 55% (1985 of 3599) were men. Sixty-five percent (2356 of 3599) of patients had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and 42% (1519 of 3599) of patients had a diagnosis of osteoporosis. We compared the frequency of dental procedures between a 4-week hazard period before the admission date for PVO and two control periods, 9 to 12 weeks and 17 to 20 weeks before the admission date for PVO, within individuals. We calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Comparing the hazard and matched control periods within individuals demonstrated that dental procedures were not associated with an increased risk of PVO (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.92]; p < 0.001). Additional analysis stratified by antibiotic prophylaxis use showed that antibiotic prophylaxis was not associated with a lower OR of developing PVO after dental procedures (with antibiotic prophylaxis: OR 1.11 [95% CI 0.93 to 1.32]; p < 0.26, without antibiotic prophylaxis: OR 0.72 [95% CI 0.63 to 0.83]; p < 0.001). Our sensitivity analyses, in which the exposure assessment interval was extended from 4 to 8 or 12 weeks and exposure was stratified by whether the dental procedure was invasive, demonstrated results that were consistent with our main analysis. CONCLUSION: Dental procedures were not associated with an increased risk of subsequent PVO in this case-crossover study. The effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis was not demonstrated in the additional analysis that categorized exposure according to the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Our results suggest that the association between dental procedures and PVO may have been overestimated. Maintaining good oral hygiene may be important in preventing the development of PVO. The indications for antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures should be reconsidered in view of the potential risk of adverse drug reactions to antibiotic prophylaxis and the emergence of drug-resistant pathogens. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and assess the role of antibiotic prophylaxis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Association between dental procedures and periprosthetic joint infection: A case-crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Although the risk of dental procedures as a cause of bacteremia has been recognized, evidence regarding the association between dental procedures and late periprosthetic joint infection (LPJI) is scarce. We sought to determine whether dental procedures are associated with an increased risk of LPJI. METHODS: The study was conducted under a case-crossover design using a large claims database in Japan. We identified adult patients who had undergone dental procedures and were hospitalized for LPJI between April 2014 and September 2021. Exposure to dental procedures was assessed during a case period of 1-4 weeks, with two control periods of 9-12 weeks and 17-20 weeks, preceding LPJI hospital admission. Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of LPJI associated with dental procedures in the case period compared with the two control periods. RESULTS: In total, 241 patients with LPJI were included in the case-crossover study. At least one dental procedure was performed in 46 patients (19.1%) in the hazard period and in 75 patients (31.1%) in the control periods. The OR for LPJI with dental procedures was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.61-1.53; p = 0.88). Findings were robust in several sensitivity analyses, including stratification by whether the dental procedure included antibiotic prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that dental procedures are not associated with increased risk of LPJI, and will raise questions about the recommendation for antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures.

Recurrence rate after posterior percutaneous screw fixation without anterior debridement for pyogenic spondylitis compared with conservative treatment: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) posterior fixation without anterior debridement for pyogenic spondylitis can improve patient quality of life compared with conservative treatment. However, data on the risk of recurrence after PPS posterior fixation compared with conservative treatment is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the recurrence rate of pyogenic spondylitis after PPS posterior fixation without anterior debridement and conservative treatment. METHODS: The study was conducted under a retrospective cohort design in patients hospitalized for pyogenic spondylitis between January 2016 and December 2020 at 10 affiliated institutions. We used propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors, including patient demographics, radiographic findings, and isolated microorganisms. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for recurrence of pyogenic spondylitis during the follow-up period in the matched cohort. RESULTS: 148 patients (41 in the PPS group and 107 in the conservative group) were included. After propensity score matching, 37 patients were retained in each group. PPS posterior fixation without anterior debridement was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence compared with conservative treatment with orthosis (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.18-3.59; P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-center retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized for pyogenic spondylitis, we found no association in the incidence of recurrence between PPS posterior fixation without anterior debridement and conservative treatment.

Minimally invasive LLIF surgery to decrease the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease compared to conventional open TLIF.

PURPOSE: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (Mis-LLIF) can establish indirect decompression by lifting the vertebra with a large intervertebral cage, which causes less damage to the posterior elements. Thus, Mis-LLIF is expected to reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD). The aim of the study was to compare the occurrence of ASD between Mis-LLIF and conventional open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS: A total of 156 patients (TLIF group = 88, Mis-LLIF group = 68) who underwent single-level lumbar interbody fusion (L2/3, L3/4, or L4/5) at a single institution between 2003 and 2018 with minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of symptomatic ASD requiring reoperation (S-ASD) and radiological adjacent segment degeneration (R-ASD) 2 years postoperatively were investigated between 51 paired patients from both groups who were propensity score (PS) matched by demographic and baseline clinical data. The effect of characteristics arising from differences in surgical methods between Mis-LLIF and TLIF, such as the amount of distraction of the index fused level (∆H), on S-ASD and R-ASD was also examined. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of S-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups (adjusted OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.41-3.9). There was no significant difference in the incidence of R-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups both at the cranial (adjusted OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.22-4.5) and caudal level (adjusted OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.44-5.3). On the other hand, ∆H was significantly higher in the Mis-LLIF group than in the TLIF group (3.6 mm vs. 1.7 mm, respectively, P < 0.0001), and was extracted as a significant independent risk factor for S-ASD (adjusted HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.3) and R-ASD at the cranial side (adjusted HR 6.4; 95% CI 1.7-24) in multivariable analysis with PS adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of R-ASD or S-ASD was not significantly reduced in the Mis-LLIF group compared to the TLIF group, with greater ∆H potentially being a contributing factor. Using a thin cage in both TLIF and Mis-LLIF may decrease the occurrence of ASD.

CT-based analysis of sagittal and coronal lumbar endplate morphology: multivariate analysis of factors associated with endplate depth.

PURPOSE: Lumbar endplate morphology varies in individuals; thus, custom-made implants are sometimes more useful than standardized implants. This study aimed to analyze endplate morphology and factors associated with endplate depth using computed tomography (CT) in a non-symptomatic population. METHODS: In total, 118 lumbar CT images of non-symptomatic individuals without severe degenerative change (aged 20-79 years) were retrospectively reviewed. The following radiographic parameters were measured in each lumbar vertebral segment (T12-S1) to determine endplate depth: superior/inferior endplate depth in the midsagittal and midcoronal planes, disk angle, and height. The relationship between baseline demographics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], Hounsfield unit of the L1 vertebral body, and pelvic incidence [PI]) and endplate depth was analyzed. RESULTS: Toward the caudal level, the superior endplate depth increased, sagittal inferior depth decreased, and coronal inferior depth increased. Multivariate analysis revealed that endplate depth was significantly associated with age (p < 0.001), while inferior endplate depth was associated with PI (p = 0.01). Superior endplate depth was associated with female sex (sagittal: p = 0.005, coronal: p = 0.002). Endplate depth, except for the inferior coronal region, was associated with low BMI (sagittal superior: p = 0.005; coronal superior and sagittal inferior: p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Endplate depths tend to be larger toward the caudal level, particularly in the superior endplate. Surgeons should thoroughly evaluate the preoperative CT image because various endplate morphologies require attention to cage shape when performing lumbar interbody fusion, especially in patients who are older, are female, have low BMI, and have large PI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Predictors of the Need for Surgery in Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Cohort Longitudinal Study Using a Claims-based Database.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine predictors associated with the needfor cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (cOPLL) surgery amongindividuals with cOPLL. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: cOPLL is a spinal disorder caused by ectopic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. However, factors associated with a higher rate of surgery to treat the neurological symptoms of cOPLL are poorly understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study using a commercial administrative claims database from JMDC Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) enrolled patients newly diagnosed with cOPLL from April 2005 to October 2020 and followed to April 2021. A total of 1506 cOPLL patients aged 18 years or older with no history of cervical spine surgery and with a record of metabolic profiles obtained at general health checkups were included. Cox proportional hazards regression models identified patient characteristics and comorbidities associated with cOPLL surgery. RESULTS: Of 1506 patients with cOPLL with a median of 1.8 years of follow-up after initial cOPLL diagnosis, 439 (29.2%) received cOPLL surgery. The 1-year cumulative incidence (95% CI) was 26.0% (23.7-28.2). In multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis, male (hazard ratio: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.26-2.24; P < 0.001) and obesity (body mass index: ≥25) (hazard ratio: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.10-1.89; P = 0.007) were associated with an increased risk of cOPLL surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this large claims-based study of adults newly diagnosed with cOPLL, males and obesity were associated with a higher risk of cOPLL surgery. These findings may help clinicians to predict the future course of cOPLL in patients, although further research is needed to elucidate the biological role of these progression-associated factors.

Association of two-staged surgery with systemic perioperative complications in lateral lumbar interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score-weighted study.

PURPOSE: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery carries a higher risk of perioperative systemic complications. However, evidence for the effect of planned two-staged surgery on the incidence of perioperative systemic complications is scarce. Here, we evaluated the effect of two-staged surgery on perioperative complications following ASD surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). METHODS: The study was conducted under a retrospective multi-center cohort design. Data on 293 consecutive ASD patients (107 in the two-staged group and 186 in the one-day group) receiving corrective surgery using LLIF between 2012 and 2021 were collected. Clinical outcomes included occurrence of perioperative systemic complications, reoperation, and intraoperative complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion, and length of hospital stay. The analysis was conducted using propensity score (PS)-stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting to adjust for confounding factors. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in a PS-weighted cohort. RESULTS: In this cohort, 19 (18.4%) patients in the two-staged group and 43 (23.1%) patients in the one-day group experienced any systemic perioperative complication within 30 days following ASD surgery. In the PS-weighted cohort, compared with the patients undergoing one-day surgery, no association with the risk of systemic perioperative complications was seen in patients undergoing two-staged surgery (PS-weighted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37-1.63; p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that two-staged surgery was not associated with risk for perioperative systemic complications following ASD surgery using LLIF.

Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Propensity Score-Weighted Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ( P /TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have shown that LLIF can improve neurological symptoms to a comparable degree to P /TLIF. However, data on the risk of SSI after LLIF is lacking compared with P /TLIF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted under a retrospective cohort design in patients undergoing LLIF or P /TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases between 2013 and 2020 using a hospital administrative database. We used propensity score overlap weighting to adjust for confounding factors including age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, number of fusion levels, hospital size, and surgery year. We estimated weighted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for SSI within 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: We compared the risk of SSI between 2874 patients who underwent LLIF and 24,245 patients who received P/TLIF Patients who had received LLIF were at significantly less risk of experiencing an SSI compared with those receiving P/TLIF (0.7% vs. 1.2%; weighted OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36 -0.92; P=0.02). As a secondary outcome, patients who had received LLIF had less risk of transfusion (7.8% vs. 11.8%; weighted OR: 0.63; 95% CI:0.54 -0.73; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing lumbar interbody fusion, LLIF was associated with a significantly lower risk of SSI than P /TLIF. The small, but significantly, decreased risk of SSI associated with LLIF may inform decisions regarding the technical approach for lumbar interbody fusion.

Reoperation Rates of Microendoscopic Discectomy Compared With Conventional Open Lumbar Discectomy: A Large-database Study.

BACKGROUND: Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation has been shown to be as effective as traditional microdiscectomy or open discectomy in terms of clinical outcomes such as pain relief, and it is less invasive. Nevertheless, the reoperation rate for microendoscopic discectomy compared with microdiscectomy or open discectomy remains unclear, possibly due to difficulties in conducting follow-up of sufficient duration and in obtaining information about reoperation in other facilities. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the rate of reoperation after microendoscopic discectomy for primary lumbar disc herniation on a large scale at a median of 4 years postoperatively? (2) Is there any difference in revision rate at a median of 4 years and within 90 days postoperatively based on surgical method? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, comparative study of adult patients who underwent microendoscopic discectomy or microdiscectomy or open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation from April 2008 to October 2017 and who were followed until October 2020 using a commercially available administrative claims database from JMDC Inc. This claims-based database provided information on individual patients collected across multiple hospitals, which improved the accuracy of postoperative reoperation rates. We included 3961 patients who received microendoscopic discectomy or microdiscectomy or open discectomy between April 2008 and October 2017 in the JMDC claims database. After applying exclusion criteria, 50% (1968 of 3961) of patients were eligible for this study. Propensity score-weighted analyses were conducted in 646 patients in the microendoscopic discectomy group and in 1322 in the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group, with a median (IQR) of 4 years (3 to 6) of follow-up in both groups. Mean patient age was 42 ± 12 years in the microendoscopic discectomy group and 43 ± 12 years in the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group. Males accounted for 78% (505 of 646) of patients in the microendoscopic discectomy group and 79% (1050 of 1322) of patients in microdiscectomy or open discectomy group. The proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus in the microendoscopic discectomy group (10% [64 of 646]) was less than in the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group (15% [195 of 1322]). The primary outcome was Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from any type of additional lumbar spine surgery at a median of 4 years after the index surgery. The secondary outcome was survival probability using the Kaplan-Meier method with endpoints of any type of reoperation within 90 days after the index surgery. To determine which procedure had the higher revision rate, we conducted propensity score overlap weighting analysis, which controlled for potential confounding variables such as age, sex, comorbidities, and type of hospital as well as Cox proportional hazard models to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative reoperation rate was 12% (95% CI 9% to 15%) in the microendoscopic discectomy group and 7% (95% CI 6% to 9%) in the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group. After controlling for potentially confounding variables like age, sex, and diabetes mellitus, the microendoscopic discectomy group had a higher reoperation risk than the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group (weighted HR 1.57 [95% CI 1.14 to 2.16]; p = 0.004). Within 90 days of the index surgery, after controlling for potentially confounding variables like age, sex, and diabetes mellitus, we found no difference between the microendoscopic discectomy group and microdiscectomy or open discectomy group in terms of risk of reoperation (weighted HR 1.38 [95% CI 0.68 to 2.79]; p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: Given the higher reoperation risk with microendoscopic discectomy compared with microdiscectomy or open discectomy at a median of 4 years of follow-up, surgeons should select microdiscectomy or open discectomy, despite the current popularity of microendoscopic discectomy. The revision risk of microendoscopic discectomy compared with microdiscectomy or open discectomy in the long term remains unclear. Future large, prospective, multicenter cohort studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the association between microendoscopic discectomy and risk of reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ⅲ, therapeutic study.

Residual anterior cord compression after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: evaluation of risk factors according to the most severely stenotic vertebral segment.

OBJECTIVE: Residual anterior spinal cord compression (RASCC) after cervical laminoplasty, which has been confirmed on postoperative MRI, is reportedly associated with poor clinical outcomes. To date, only a few studies have described the risk factors associated with RASCC. The aim of this study was to identify the factors that can predict the occurrence of RASCC after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), focusing on the location of the most stenotic segment. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, 120 patients who underwent C3-7 laminoplasty for multilevel CSM were included. Different techniques were used for C3 decompression, i.e., partial (dome-laminotomy) or complete (laminoplasty/laminectomy) decompression. RASCC was diagnosed using MRI conducted 3 weeks postoperatively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the segment with the most severe stenosis (Seg-MSS; C3-4 vs C4-7). Demographics, radiological data, and C3 decompression technique were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, intergroup comparisons were performed based on Seg-MSS. A logistic regression model was constructed to identify the factors predicting RASCC after patient stratification according to Seg-MSS. RESULTS: Forty patients (33.3%) had RASCC. The patients with Seg-MSS at C3-4 (51.3%) had a significantly higher incidence of RASCC (p = 0.003) than those with Seg-MSS at C4-7 (24.7%). Logistic regression analysis showed that in patients with Seg-MSS at C3-4, C3 partial decompression demonstrated a greater association with RASCC as opposed to complete decompression. Conversely, in patients with Seg-MSS at C4-7, kyphotic segmental lordotic angle was associated with an increased risk of RASCC. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for RASCC differed depending on the location of the most stenotic segment (C3-4 vs C4-7). If there is segmental kyphosis at the most stenotic segment at C4-7, anterior decompression and fusion should be considered. If C3-4 is the most stenotic segment, anterior surgery is also recommended, but alternatively, one can choose laminoplasty with complete C3 laminectomy and resection of the C2-3 ligamentum flavum.

Clinical Features and Surgical Outcomes of Lower Lumbar Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse with Symptomatic Stenosis: A Surgical Strategy from a Multicenter Case Series.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter case series was conducted. PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of lower lumbar osteoporotic vertebral collapse (LL-OVC) with symptomatic stenosis based on various surgical procedures and classify them using the newly developed collapse severity criteria. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The surgical outcomes of LL-OVC with symptomatic stenosis remain unclear. METHODS: We investigated patients who underwent surgical intervention for LL-OVC (L3, L4, and/or L5) with symptomatic foraminal and/or central stenosis from eight spine centers. Only patients with a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year were included. We developed new criteria to grade vertebral collapse severity (grade 1, 0%-25%; grade 2, 25%-50%; grade 3, 50%-75%; and grade 4, 75%-100%). The clinical features and outcomes were compared based on the collapse grade and surgical procedures performed (i.e., decompression alone, posterior lateral fusion [PLF], lateral interbody fusion [LIF], posterior/transforaminal interbody fusion [PLIF/TLIF], or vertebral column resection [VCR]). RESULTS: In this study, 59 patients (average age, 77.4 years) were included. The average follow-up period was 24.6 months. The clinical outcome score (Japanese Orthopaedic Association score) was more favorable in the LIF and PLIF/TLIF groups than in the decompression alone, PLF, and VCR groups. The use of VCR was associated with a high rate of revision surgery (57.1%). No significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed between the collapse grades; however, grade 4 collapse was associated with a high rate of revision surgery (40.0%). CONCLUSIONS: When treating LL-OVC, appropriate instrumented reconstruction with rigid intervertebral stability is necessary. According to our newly developed criteria, LIF may be a surgical option for any collapse grade. The use of VCR for grade 4 collapse is associated with a high rate of revision.

Salvage Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Pseudarthrosis after Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to demonstrate the efficacy of salvage oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery for pseudarthrosis after posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF). METHODS: The study group were patients with leg or back pain induced by pseudarthrosis after PLIF/TLIF. These patients underwent salvage OLIF surgeries in our institutions between July 2015 and Oct 2019. We retrospectively evaluated their clinical and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: Seven consecutive patients (all male; mean age 68.4 ± 9.3 years, range 53-81 years) were included in this study. There was no intraoperative complications in all cases. Six of 7 patients achieved bone union (at average 33.4 months follow-up) and had a successful postoperative course. Only 1 patient failed to gain bony fusion and required additional revision surgery due to progression of sagittal and coronal malalignment at 18 months after salvage OLIF surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The salvage OLIF approach was useful option for pseudarthrosis after PLIF/TLIF. It enabled us to build a rigid anterior support, allowed for extensive curettage of intervertebral scar tissue, and reduced the rate of the complications associated with dealing with posterior scar tissue.

Incidence and Clinical Features of Postoperative Symptomatic Hematoma after Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Study of 45 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic postoperative hematoma after spine surgery is a rare but serious complication. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and clinical features of symptomatic postoperative hematoma after spine surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 10,680 patients who underwent spine surgery between 2002 and 2012 in nine hospitals. We reviewed the incidence of postoperative hematoma and its clinical features, including time before onset, main symptoms, and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: The overall incidence of symptomatic postoperative hematoma after spine surgery was 0.4% (45/10,680). Postoperative hematoma was more frequent after thoracic spine surgery than after cervical or lumbar surgery. The onset of postoperative hematoma occurred at an average of 2.6 days (range 0-14 days) postoperatively. The chief symptoms caused by postoperative hematoma after spine surgery were tetra/paraplegia in 30 patients, hemiplegia in eight patients, intractable pain in five patients, and airway dysfunction in two patients. Surgical evacuation of the spinal epidural hematoma resulted in improvement of at least one grade in 35 patients, while four patients had complete motor paralysis even after evacuation surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We report the clinical details of 45 patients with postoperative hematoma after spine surgery. This information could assist surgeons to make a prompt diagnosis and perform early evacuation surgery for postoperative hematoma following spine surgery.

Prognostic Factors for Drop Foot Due to Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: The Impact of Surgical Timing on Postoperative Recovery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical series. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic factors for the improvement of drop foot caused by degenerative lumbar disease after surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Drop foot may be caused by lumbar spinal diseases and may affect daily life. There are limited data regarding predictors of drop foot, especially surgical timing. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 87 patients with drop foot. Prognostic factors and precise timing of surgery affecting drop foot improvement were examined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty patients (46.0%) recovered from drop foot after surgery. Age [odds ratio (OR)=0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.98; P=0.01], preoperative anterior tibialis muscle strength (OR=12.0; 95% CI, 2.41-59.9; P=0.002), and duration of drop foot before surgery (OR=3.59; 95% CI, 1.09-11.8; P=0.04) were significant prognostic factors. Two months was the most appropriate cutoff for surgery after appearance of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Age, preoperative tibialis anterior muscle strength, and duration of drop foot were statistically significant prognostic factors of recovery from drop foot. Surgery within 2 months after the onset of drop foot may improve postoperative outcome.

Outcomes after decompression surgery without fusion for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and substantial low back pain.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of decompression surgery alone for patients with intolerable low back pain. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 222 patients who underwent spinal decompression without fusion surgery who had substantial preoperative low back pain (preoperative numerical rating scale score ≥ 5). Their clinical outcomes were assessed using the numerical rating scale and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) preoperatively and at 3 months and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: At 3 months and 1 year after surgery compared with baseline, there was a significant improvement in the overall mean numerical rating scale scores for low back pain (baseline = 6.8, 3 months = 2.1, 1 year = 2.7), leg pain (6.8, 2.1, 2.7), and leg numbness (6.4, 2.9, 3.2) (P < 0.05). The efficacy rate assessed by JOABPEQ was 68.1% for pain-related disorders, 47.0% for lumbar spine dysfunction, 63.3% for walking ability, 48.2% for social life dysfunction, and 21.6% for psychological disorders. When patients were classified into three groups depending on their degree of leg pain (mild, moderate, and severe), there was no significant difference in the efficacy rate between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Decompression surgery can improve low back pain, regardless of the degree of preoperative leg pain, but the average score for LBP and leg pain slightly worsened between 3 months and 1 year after surgery. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Vertebroplasty Using Allograft Bone Chips with Posterior Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures with Neurological Deficits.

INTRODUCTION: In general, osteoporotic vertebral fractures with neurological deficits require surgery. However, the ideal surgical method remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy of combining posterior instrumented fusion and vertebroplasty using allograft bone chips. METHODS: Twelve patients (five men, seven women; age 68-84 years, mean age 75.9 years) with osteoporotic vertebral fractures with neurological deficits were reviewed retrospectively. They underwent posterior instrumented fusion and vertebroplasty, using allograft bone, at our institution between January 2007 and June 2016. We assessed the surgical results, radiologically and neurologically, after a mean follow-up of 37.3 months. RESULTS: The mean local kyphosis angle was 10° before surgery, -3.3° immediately after surgery, and 4.4° at follow-up. The average spinal canal compromise was 26.9% before surgery and 19.5% at follow-up. All patients achieved bony fusion and none needed additional surgery. All patients improved by at least one grade on the modified Frankel grading system. CONCLUSIONS: Combining vertebroplasty, using allograft bone chips, and posterior instrumented fusion appears to be an effective option for osteoporotic vertebral fractures with neurological deficits.

Efficacy of Target Drug Delivery and Dead Space Reduction Using Antibiotic-loaded Bone Cement for the Treatment of Complex Spinal Infection.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: We have treated complex cases of surgical site infection (SSI) successfully using antibiotic-loaded bone cement to avoid the need for implant removal. In the present study, we describe a new treatment option for SSI. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although there are several treatment options for SSI after spinal surgery involving instrumentation, several types of problems may arise and are difficult to cure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with SSI after undergoing spinal surgery involving instrumentation were studied. All had been refractory to conventional treatments, including intravenous antibiotic administration and conventional debridement and irrigation. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement was placed on and around the instrumentation to cover them and to occupy the surrounding dead space. Two general types of antibiotics were loaded into the polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. The recipes for the mixture were changed depending on the bacterial cultures. Sensitive antibiotics were administered generally for 2-6 weeks until the C-reactive protein level was normalized. RESULTS: All patients were treated successfully using antibiotic-loaded bone cement. Only 1 patient needed a repeat of this procedure to treat an infection. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement was placed in situ in all patients during the follow-up period and there were no significant adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement treatment reduces the dead space and achieves the targeted drug delivery simultaneously. Treatment using antibiotic-loaded bone cement is an effective treatment option for complex spinal SSI.